Anti-gravity exists, is in use today as are more efficient ways of producing energy exists. The MYT engine which produces the same amount of energy as a normal engine but only using 5% of the fuel a normal engine uses, or the PAPP engine from Jim Sabori that only uses the power of zero point energy and a small amount of noble gases, can deliver 500 HP for a period of 10 years. Or the Mathernitha machine which delivers 3 to 4 KWh out of ‘thin air’ and has done for the last 20 years.
Everything vibrates that is because atoms vibrate and that is because the sub molecular particles are in harmonic resonance, and maintain equilibrium. Gravity is vibration generated by the presence of mass and it can be neutralised by altering the harmonic resonance of the gravitational field. In other words if you generate vibrations you can alter gravity and with super-conductive materials the amount of energy needed for generating the vibrations is greatly reduced. A practical example of reducing one vibration with other vibrations is the use of anti-sound. If you instantaneously produce the exact opposite waveform that comes towards you in the form of sound the sound will become inert.
One of the forms of creating anti-gravity is called auditive levitation; a method used by Tibetan
monks to elevate objects over a distance of up to 250 metres in the air. Theorist around the world theorize that big monuments like those of the Egyptians and Mayan people where build this way. The location of these buildings are often not far from places where there is gold to be found. Other examples of anti-gravity we find in the vast amount of UFO sightings, these UFO sightings are actually experiments run by different governments in their search for anti-gravity propulsion. 9. So, if the technique is known why don’t we all transport using anti-gravity propulsion. For each year of technological advance the military advance with 44 years. All science is merely a means to an end. The means is knowledge. The end is control. Who will be the beneficiary? What do they want? What they want is control, the establishment of a global economy which is totally predictable and can be manipulated in every sense.
What would this mean to the Petroleum based energy cartels that are at the controls of the Global economy? Or the environment and the health of the population. If the knowledge to produce free energy were made available to the general public It would mean a massive paradigm shift of unprecedented scale, a massive shift of power and a new economy based on well being, extinguishing the Global elites power and influence. What would happen to these monopolies if the people of the world did not need gasoline, electricity, gas, or symptom based medicines from the pharmaceutical industry? It would mean two things; The corporations who control these monopolies would loose money and influence and their agenda to prepare the world for world
domination under a global fascist dictatorship in the custody of the elite ruling houses of Europe would fail.
There are former US and UK armed forces and secret service personnel, Scientists and Medical professionals who have come forward with information regarding sensitive information that is deliberately being with-held from the public, to the detriment of the public. Such as the cure for Cancer or the dangers of genetically modified foods. These whistle-blowers have been murdered for making their information public. Also some of the cases you are about to witness have been made public because the victims have prosecuted the NSA and CIA in court for stalking, harassing and torturing of their persons and have won.
The Second World War did great things for the US economy. The industry of war gave everybody jobs and prosperity allowing for the production and consumption of consumer goods. this Marshall aid also stimulated the European economy at the time lending it the impulse it needed. War, Its disruptive, destabilising nature aside, can lead to flourishing economies and improvements in technology for those on the right side. The trigger for the US to go to war was Pearl Harbour, this is what is called a catalyzing event. Of course it’s an coincidence when you read a report entitled Rebuilding American defences written by a committee called The Project for a New American Century and in the report is a part that says: The process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbour. These are the words of a neo-con think-tank with amongst them people like Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, Wolfowitz and Donald Rumsfeld. What it says is that America needs a war to transform into its next shape and 911 is our new Pearl Harbour. Other False Flag operations that have resulted in war include the Gulf of Tonkin Incident and The Sinking of the Lusitania, and the Reichstag fire in Berlin which was an arson attack on the German parliament Building on the 27th of February 1933, that resulted in the establishment of Nazi Germany.
On Aug. 7, 1964, Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, authorising the Vietnam war based on what is now widely believed to be faulty intelligence, plunging the united States into war without a congressional declaration of war. On August 2, 1964, the destroyer USS Maddox engaged three North Vietnamese Navy torpedo boats of the 135th Torpedo Squadron. A sea battle resulted, in which the Maddox four USN jet fighter bombers strafed the torpedo boats. It is now widely believed the incident never happened. When examining the history surrounding the sinking of the Lusitania many factors allude to the Lusitania being deliberately placed in danger by the British authorities, so as to entice a U-Boat attack and thereby drag the USA into the war. The British authorities were aware that a German submarine was in the path of the Lusitania, but failed to divert the ship to a safer route and they also failed to provide a destroyer escort, although destroyers were available in a nearby port. The ship was also ordered to reduce speed when it entered the war zone, for reasons that have been kept secret ever since.
On September 11, 2001, the towers were collapsed by controlled demolition? In the basic tool kit of the manipulation of people one of the strongest weapons is the manipulation of truth. What matters is not whether or not something is true or not, what is important is what is Believed to be true. The US government through a controlled media for instance is trying to make people believe that the person responsible for bringing down the twin towers was ostensibly Osama Bin Laden. 6 weeks before the WTC towers collapsed the owner had a new insurance policy made up, ensuring that the owner, if the towers would collapse due to terrorist attack, would get paid the amount of 3,5 billion dollars? Six months before the 9/11 attacks the World Trade Center was “privatized” by being leased to a private sector developer, Larry Silverstein. The lease was purchased by the Silverstein Group for $3.2 billion. The towers required some $200 million in renovations and improvements, most of which related to removal and replacement of building materials declared to be health hazards in the years since the towers were built.